Reading the evidence for attribution
Editorial reading guide
These new editorial guides explain the published plan. They are not translations of complete chapters; some entries, particularly in Volume II, still contain only headings.
Reading the evidence for attribution
The third volume organizes the investigation around six sources of titles and attribution. Keep four questions apart: is the title recorded, is the work identifiable, does a witness survive, and is its attribution supported? Neither a catalogue entry nor a modern translation alone settles all four. The chapter notes explain how the sources can be compared.
Chapters · Read the complete Arabic source
First source: the Fihrist, or list of works
Treat the Fihrist as a particular documentary witness, with its own manuscripts and textual history. Separate the authenticity of the list from the identification of each work named in it. One title may occur in several forms; two similar titles may also refer to distinct works. Preserve the source’s numbering.
Second source: al-Qunawi’s authorizations and audition records
An ijaza is an authorization; a sama record documents a reading or audition. Examine names, dates, titles and the wording of the record together. These documents can connect a named work to an identifiable act of transmission. Their force depends on the particular witness, not simply on the presence of a familiar name.
Third source: references in other securely attributed works
When Ibn al-Arabi names another work, record the wording and location of that self-reference. Distinguish an exact title from a descriptive phrase and a completed book from a projected work. An internal reference supports attribution only when the referring text and the identification of the referred work are themselves secure.
Fourth source: the Ijaza for al-Malik al-Muzaffar
Keep the recipient’s identity, the document’s date and its list of works together. Al-Muzaffar is a royal title used by more than one ruler; matching that title alone is insufficient identification. An authorization and a catalogue answer different questions, even when the authorization includes a list of books.
Fifth source: titles appended to the Ijaza
Ask whether each title belongs to the original document, a later addition or an editorial reconstruction. Preserve that distinction when combining lists. A supplement can be valuable evidence without automatically carrying the same authority as the document to which it has been attached.
Sixth source: works named in other sources
Identify the author, date and purpose of each external source. A manuscript catalogue, a biographical notice and a modern bibliography provide different kinds of evidence. Record uncertain attributions as uncertain. The aim is an inspectable dossier for each work, not an inflated total obtained by counting every title as a separate authenticated book.
Selected readings
Why the works follow the Fihrist’s order
Therefore, after critically editing the Fihrist on the basis of the manuscript authenticated by Shaykh Muhyiddin himself, we found that the best way t…
Selected excerpt · translation draftDirect and indirect sources in Osman Yahya’s catalogue
Osman Yahya based his classification on different sources, divided into direct and indirect sources. The direct sources are Shaykh Muhyiddin Ibn al-Ar…
Selected excerpt · translation draftCounting titles is not counting authenticated works
Osman Yahya relied directly on Sarkis Awwad’s edition of the Fihrist and Abd al-Rahman Badawi’s edition of the Ijaza, as well as earlier research publ…
Selected excerpt · translation draftDistinguishing the Ijaza from additions by copyists
After carefully editing the Fihrist and Ijaza, as we shall explain in chapters one and four respectively, we shall find that the total derived by Osma…
Selected excerpt · translation draftThe first three sources in the attribution scheme
On the basis of the preceding discussion, we shall collect the titles of the Greatest Master’s works from six sources. The first three are reliable, a…
Selected excerpt · translation draftAn argument about the Fihrist’s attribution
Mahmud Ghurab considers attribution of this list to Shaykh Muhyiddin impossible, because important works mentioned by the Master elsewhere do not appe…
Selected excerpt · translation draftThe Qunawi manuscript and its audition record
From the manuscript list above, we find that the Fihrist manuscript in Yusuf Agha miscellany no. 7838—the same as no. 5624 in the modern numbering—is …
Selected excerpt · translation draftWhat the Fihrist says about its own scope
One of the brethren asked me to record for him on these sheets everything I had composed and produced concerning realities and mysteries, along the pa…
Selected excerpt · translation draft